FDL again, was: My concerns about GPLv3 process

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   You have repeatedly shown why _in_your_opinion_ invariant sections
   make sense, without touching on the problems (fwiw, I think they
   make sense, but the problems outweight the benetis).

I don't see them as problems, I have repeatedly explained why they are
not problems and have repatedly stated that I do not see these issues
as problems.  It is exactly the same scenario of combining a GPLed
work with a work which is licensed under an license which is
incompatible with the GPL.  Both of which are free software.

   As Simo Sorce suggested, let's agree to disagree and stop this
   useless thread. BTW, you agreed to disagree about semantics quite
   some time ago[4], so why are we still wasting everyone's time?

Maybe Because Frank is to busy spreading lies.