FDL again, was: My concerns about GPLv3 process
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
rms at 1407.org
Fri Feb 24 09:53:40 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 22:12 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > The rest is irrelevant, since it is clear you haven't read the GFDL.
> Can you prove he hasn't read it? Then don't claim it so quickly.
Let's see... he makes direct claims over content of the GFDL of things
that not only are _not_ there, but also explicitly can't be according to
Either he's trusting what _others_ said or he doesn't understand it at
all or worse...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Discussion