FDL again, was: My concerns about GPLv3 process

Sam Liddicott sam at liddicott.com
Mon Feb 13 22:14:08 UTC 2006

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:

>   Because you can't make a GPLed program non free against the authors
>   will.
>Neither can you make a GFDLed document non-free against the authors
>I think it is better to simply agree to disagree about the GFDL, just
>like one has to agree to disagree about BSD-like licenses vs. copyleft

Are we disagreeing about appropriateness of the licenses or the facts of
the licenses and their provisions?

Or at least could someone state the resultant area of disagreement for
my own edification so I can add it to my mental "watch out for" list.


More information about the Discussion mailing list