FDL again, was: My concerns about GPLv3 process
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Mon Feb 13 20:11:43 UTC 2006
That's why it's harmful. If it wasn't allowed by the license, it
could simply be prohibited by enforcing the license. If you don't
think the outcome (as I described in an extreme form) is harmful,
then we just have to disagree. I think it's harmful, so I don't
like the FDL.
That you consider it harmful is one thing, it doesn't make the clauses
harmful in it self.
> In theory, anyone can go and make Linux a non-free program, since
> it is simply impossible to enforce the license there.
Back up this claim.
What part of `in theory' didn't you get?
More information about the Discussion