FDL again, was: My concerns about GPLv3 process

Alfred M. Szmidt ams at gnu.org
Fri Feb 10 21:12:24 UTC 2006

   > >  Note that it claims the FDL purpose is for functional work.
   > ... with non-functional parts.

   Were that true, then the FDL preamble would be an argument that the
   FDL is not suitable for applying to invariant sections.


   I think a level-headed discussion is impossible if you are going to
   contradict the licence you claim to support. Please stick to the

I haven't contradicted anything.  You are inventing things, and
putting words into my mouth.

More information about the Discussion mailing list