FDL again, was: My concerns about GPLv3 process
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Fri Feb 10 21:12:24 UTC 2006
> > Note that it claims the FDL purpose is for functional work.
> ... with non-functional parts.
Were that true, then the FDL preamble would be an argument that the
FDL is not suitable for applying to invariant sections.
I think a level-headed discussion is impossible if you are going to
contradict the licence you claim to support. Please stick to the
I haven't contradicted anything. You are inventing things, and
putting words into my mouth.
More information about the Discussion