Key escrow in the UK
Jeremiah Foster
jeremiah.foster at gmail.com
Fri Jul 29 12:01:08 UTC 2005
On Jul 29, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Gareth Bowker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> [...]
>> Not true. If you had a key recovery mechanism, you could quickly
>> recovery the key and encrypted information, thus potentially saving
>> lives. Look at the situation today, the police suspect another attack
>> with innocent people killed is imminent, oughtn't there be a mechanism
>> to prevent this needless death?
>
> You're making the assumption that the criminals will stop using the
> current encryption technologies and switch to one which allows key
> escrow.
> You're also assuming that the criminals will continue to use this
> "watered-down" encryption to discuss their criminal activities, hoping
> that no-one will snoop on their communications.
>
> Why would they do that, if they knew their communications could now be
> intercepted?
True, those using private key encryption may move to another form of
encryption, but is there another form of encryption as powerful and
easily available?
It is not so much the interception of communications that the police
are interested in, it is the decrypting of data on hard drives captured
in raids of suspected bomber's homes. In other words, should the police
have an escrowed key available for use only in situations where they
have already convinced the court that a search warrant is necessary?
Jeremiah
More information about the Discussion
mailing list