French Government Lobbied to Ban Free Software

Rui Miguel Silva Seabra rms at 1407.org
Fri Dec 2 14:08:32 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 15:06 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:58 +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 08:13 +0000, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> > > Well I propose that software includes calls to validation scripts to
> > > implement such measures, and that such scripts be specifiable by
> > > environment variables in order to upgrade such scripts to provide the
> > > er.. latest enforcement that is avilable.
> > > 
> > > That would meet the requirements of the law? Which seemed to suggest
> > > that ir was lack of control that was objectionable.
> > 
> > Can you modify the variable to use a script that always returns true?
> > Yes.
> > 
> > Then that strategy is likely illegal under that law.
> 
> You can do the same with proprietary, closed source, software.
> Have you ever heard of disassemblers and binary patches ?

I know that, you know that, and anyone with two fingers of forehead
knows that.

But some don't have the foggiest idea and think that that is OK.

RUi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20051202/d468fdf7/attachment.sig>


More information about the Discussion mailing list