Free Music License?

[francois schnell]

Ben Finney wrote:

>On 14-Aug-2005, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>  
>
>>For music, I'd say that a simple `verbatim copying' license would be
>>enough.
>>    
>>
>
>Verbatim only? That fails to grant freedom to modify and redistribute.
>Do you think such a license should be called "free"?
>  
>
Hello :)

I don't know if it can be usefull to the discussion but I believe 
CC-by-sa (attribution- sharealike) is fine for artists who want a 
"GPL-like" licence for arts.

An example of what is possible thanks to the "GPL-like freedoms" for music:
http://francois.schnell.free.fr/wordpress/?p=9

An example of a  website with CC-by-sa musics and derivatives works:
http://www.opsound.org/

francois

>Why should music users get less freedom over a work than users of GPL
>programs?
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discussion mailing list
>Discussion at fsfeurope.org
>https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20050816/93a905d6/attachment.html>