Free Music License?

Ben Finney ben at
Mon Aug 15 10:30:13 UTC 2005

On 14-Aug-2005, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> For music, I'd say that a simple `verbatim copying' license would be
> enough.

Verbatim only? That fails to grant freedom to modify and redistribute.
Do you think such a license should be called "free"?

Why should music users get less freedom over a work than users of GPL

 \     "If you can't annoy somebody there is little point in writing." |
  `\                                                  -- Kingsley Amis |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <ben at>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the Discussion mailing list