Free Music License?

[Ben Finney]

On 14-Aug-2005, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> For music, I'd say that a simple `verbatim copying' license would be
> enough.

Verbatim only? That fails to grant freedom to modify and redistribute.
Do you think such a license should be called "free"?

Why should music users get less freedom over a work than users of GPL
programs?

-- 
 \     "If you can't annoy somebody there is little point in writing." |
  `\                                                  -- Kingsley Amis |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20050815/8a6a558a/attachment.sig>