Free Music License?
Alexandre Dulaunoy
alexandre.dulaunoy at ael.be
Mon Aug 15 08:31:45 UTC 2005
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 14-Aug-2005, Roland Häder wrote:
> > I mean, we already a license for software (GNU GPL) and also for
> > documentation (FDL) but no license for music (FML = Free Music
> > License?). But you cannot compare music with software nor
> > documentation. Music is different to them.
>
> It's not different under copyright law though. If you want to grant
> the same freedoms, you can use the same license for *all* your
> software: programs, documentation, music, images, data, ...
>
> The GPL talks about "program" and "source code"; so long as you make
> it clear what you consider those terms to apply to, the GPL should not
> be problematic to apply to any copyrighted work if you want.
The definition of "Program" in 0. is also broader as they use work as
definition :
"The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work,..."
So as you said, if you are able to make a clear separation between
"work" and "the preferred form of the work for making modifications to
it." the GPL can be used for any copyrighted work.
Keeping a single free license in the free community is better for the
dynamic of the community.
--
** Alexandre Dulaunoy (adulau) **** http://www.foo.be/ **** 0x44E6CBCD
**/ "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
**/ equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
**/ livelihood of monastic scribes." Jon Ippolito.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list