Official Firefox binaries non-free
Andres K. Foerster
list at AKFoerster.de
Tue Apr 5 08:42:08 UTC 2005
Am Montag, dem 04. Apr 2005 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
> Because I almost missed that information myself:
>
> http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=353
>
> RMS: I had better correct a common confusion. The Firefox binaries
> distributed by the Mozilla developers, like all their binaries, are
> not free.
[...]
> It seems that Firefox binaries are covered by an end user license
> agreement that might even not allow redistribution
> and they contain proprietary code for error reporting: Talkback.
It is really confusing!
I was alarmed by this article, so I looked up my installation of
Firefox on my windows machine and the only license I found there
was the MPL 1.1. But the MPL is a free software license.
I was very confused.
Then I installed the binary-package again, and...
indeed, the installer shows a different license!
A license which cannot be found in the installed version anymore.
And I had really trouble to find it on the net.
They are really playing hide and seek with their "end"-users!
To make the confusion complete, that license mentions at the very
beginning "MOZILLA PUBLIC LICENSE and other open source software
licenses." This again creates the false impression, that this is an
open source license and an open source product, which it really is not!
You can find the license here:
http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/EULA/firefox-en.html
> I do assume that Debian's binary packets will be okay.
Yes, they are.
They also had trouble with the naming of their binaries, because
"Firefox" is a trademark! So they had to explitely label them as
"unofficial".
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/02/msg01882.html
I hope that that there will also be other alternative offers for
Firefox-binaries and that it becomes clear, that "unofficial"
versions are better for the user!
The issue about labeling such binary distributions can be found there:
http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/
--
AKFoerster
More information about the Discussion
mailing list