BlackOut2003 - "More sutainted Software/IT needed?"
s_fsfeurope2 at nedprod.com
Sun Aug 24 03:00:01 UTC 2003
On 23 Aug 2003 at 22:48, Robert Michel wrote:
> Why FSF-Europe? Because I think the same SCADA technologie is used in
> Europe too - I think Europeans should not say or think this can`t
> happend here. There are many example of malfunction of trains, cars,
> plains,.... based on IT-mistakes. By a growing importance of IT for
> critical infrastructure as for daily live - there must be change fot
> IT. The concepts and examples of the RMI, Wupperinst & Co people can
> train the way to think for getting better sustaned solutions.
Firstly, the power situation in the US is woeful - the infrastructure
transporting the power is severely underfunded ever since
deregulation under Bush senior. This has been known for some years -
look for an article about the matter by a journalist called "Greg
Secondly, the European power infrastructure is far more tightly
regulated than the US except in the UK. Companies are obliged to
spend on certain areas where under deregulation they can spend the
bare minimum as so to maximise profit.
Thirdly, I think it would be a grave mistake to think that how the US
power companies manage their IT projects is somehow representative of
everything else. The reason IT projects fail are (in this order) (i)
lack of experience in managing, planning and deploying IT solutions
(ii) high churn rate of experienced staff (iii) a lack of
professionalism by a minority of IT professionals. Because companies
rarely have peer review or other (costly) proper quality review
schemes, one or two poor programmers can inflict masses of damage to
a project. Because of the historic shortage of workers, most
companies tolerated any poor programmer rather than fire them.
All these things will improve naturally as software engineering
matures. Until then, usually he who pays more gets a better product,
and until management understand this they can continue to expect
More information about the Discussion