GPL not encouraging new technology
Marcus Brinkmann
Marcus.Brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Fri Nov 29 15:18:38 UTC 2002
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:00:47PM +0100, Niall Douglas wrote:
> Hence, I would feel that the GPL is bad for blue-sky technology
> startups. The GPL is excellent for developing a better version of
> already existing technology which cannot be stolen by others, but no
> use for creating new technology.
>
> To prove this last probably contentious point, look at GNU/Linux. I
> personally cannot see anywhere in the entire system any completely
> unique technology. It's merely an improved version of existing know-
> how. There's no real innovation in there AFAICS, not say like Plan 9
> or EROS is a reconception from the ground up.
Uhm, but EROS is GPL and LGPL. So is the GNU Hurd, which is another
innovative operating system.
> So, hopefully you don't think me a troll. I am genuinely interested
> in what all your thoughts are.
I think that programmers of all kind should come up with innovative
programs, and that managers should come up with innovative business models
for free software ;) Also, most progress is probably incremental. There
are steep pragmatic barriers when it comes to the question of establishing
innovative software.
I also think that the availability of free software among pupils and students
can spur some innovative new free software. Studying real programs is a
very important aspect of learning to program, and the GNU software base has
some very good examples (I often look into the GNU C library, for example).
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus at gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
More information about the Discussion
mailing list