RedHat and software patents
John Tapsell
tapselj0 at cs.man.ac.uk
Mon May 27 13:10:06 UTC 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I made the proposal to add some GPL'd software to Cygwin.
>
> To be more specific, it was ACL related SW from the Linux development.
> The responsible people from red hat told me that they cannot include
> such code because read hat only allows them to use code for cygwin
> that has been written by RH people.
>
> This is devinitive a non GPL friendly behavior. The only reason to behave
> like this is that RH sells non-GPL versions and thus would get problems
> with the other code.
I see you point, and your concern, but you do see red hats reasons. A lot of
ppl have done similiar things (although just because everyone else does yadda
yadda). Even GNU won't include GPL'ed code if they don't own it.
The GNU ppl have a document on it - including reasons about being able to
protect it better, protecting against various scenarios that I've brought up
on this mailing list - that involve reversing a GPL license on software, etc.
JohnFlux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE88jAwoRvfZQkd7qoRAtMOAKCD0s1B/xho6nX0xyhfLZ9w7yJLJgCfYyql
ILHUfTbUo+j30f9YXrOxiDU=
=hLMu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Discussion
mailing list