Dilema

John Tapsell tapselj0 at cs.man.ac.uk
Mon Mar 18 22:11:46 UTC 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 18 March 2002 21:30, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 21:00, John Tapsell wrote:
> > > More proprietary software will not benefit the Linux kernel.
> >
> > Sorry for the miswording :)  I don't mean anything to do with the linux
> > kernel
>
> Hi John,
>
>  So, why would it have to be proprietary? Is that something you fear you
> would have to do, or was it a requisite from the VC's?

Well they can't see any way to make money otherwise - I can't really either.


>  Do they know of anything at all about Software Libre?
>  In your case, if you want to convice the VC's, you probably should
> avoid the words 'free as in gratis'.
>
>  So, can you tell us what kind of software it is? You don't have to go
> into hard core details.

I probably shouldn't say.. ;)
Basically trying to make the linux techies job easier by adding help, and 
parameters completion, and making shell scripts much easier to write..


JohnFlux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8lmYnoRvfZQkd7qoRAhVDAKC99zPfzjvi0niIj1WBCxkHOpHjwACeJP98
FB2N8NjPKuC4Evmj8FfeF04=
=J2OR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Discussion mailing list