BitKeeper licence critic

[Jeroen Dekkers]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 08:54:18PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> .. If you participated the standard creation, you would have a legal
> PDF and a TEXT version. This version has line numbers for the editors
> and this looks a bit ugly for this reason :-)

Only the draft versions have line numbers, not the official
standard. You can download the draft versions if you sign up for the
mailinglist, see http://www.opengroup.org/austin/ for more
information. You won't get a legal version of the standard if you
signed up.

> >Besides pdf isn't exactly a free standart, is it?
> 
> I would rather like to have a free standard but at least PDF works nearly
> everywhere.

What's non-free about the PDF?

Jeroen Dekkers
-- 
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers at jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen at openprojects
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20020316/011bd6df/attachment.sig>