What do to about BitKeeper and the Linux Kernel (was: BitKeeper licence critic)
MJ Ray
markj at cloaked.freeserve.co.uk
Fri Mar 8 13:15:41 UTC 2002
Alexandre Dulaunoy <adulau-conos at perycles.unix.be.EU.org> wrote:
> So we have look around but there is no miracle solution :
> - aegis seems a really good software but the concept are quite different
> from CVS (maybe not so bad idea). Moving from a big CVS in aegis is not
> so easy (but I'm maybe wrong)
> license : GPL
BitKeeper is also not so like CVS. I'm likely to take the step in trying to
move some of my CVS work into Aegis soon. A conversion guide is supplied
with it. If there is interest, I report back on how it goes.
> - arch looks cool and really an innovation but software is quite young
I have heard criticisms of the current arch's designs. It sounds very Tom
Lord ;-) I don't know if there will be a version that the computer
scientists can love too.
--
MJR ,----------------------------------------------------
| Q. Do you need a net-based application developing,
| or advice and training about web technology?
| A. I suggest you try http://www.luminas.co.uk/
More information about the Discussion
mailing list