BitKeeper license critic

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Fri Mar 8 11:14:17 UTC 2002


On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:27:52PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> writes:
> 
> > LWN daily pointed me to Jack Moffitt's critique of the BitKeeper license:
> >
> > 	i.cantcode.com/writing/bitkeeper.html
> 
> The license is already outdated.  Now, you have 72 hours to do the
> logging, and you have to upgrade your BitKeeper installation once a
> year (and possibly accept a new license), or you might violate one of
> the logging requirements.

Its is good that he quoted the license he wrote about then.
Rapidly chaing licences are not a good thing...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20020308/61174fbd/attachment.sig>


More information about the Discussion mailing list