BitKeeper licence critic

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:55:15AM +0000, John Tapsell wrote:
> > Is there anything we can practically do to change the bk decision? 

> IMHO, its pointless persuing this 

There is no other option than trying to convince people that giving
up freedom gradually is a bad idea and freedom will erode.

> And while I sympathise with people that say its isn't Free, 
> its is free as in money, 

Please read the critique of the licence again.

> and have stated several times that it is a very complex bit 
> of software, far more complex than say the kernel.  

Do you believe this?
How many codelines does BitKeeper have compared to the kernel?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20020307/4b1917c5/attachment.sig>