Advocating FDL University-courses
jan.wildeboer at gmx.de
Thu Jul 18 14:30:33 UTC 2002
Imran Ghory wrote:
> Instead of bothering to have the above arguement, you could have
> just fired up a webbrowser and spent a few seconds on google to
> turn up http://www.wvware.com/.
Did that, clicked on the link called "Informations and links" under
ressources and found this:
| The MS Office file formats (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Office Binder and
| Office Drawing) were all made freely available from the MS msdn
| website in 1998.
Sounds good :-)
| Since then they have been removed,
Sounds bad :-(
| but MS made cd's available of their website to developers that
| registered to receive them. These cd's are commonly available.
| The particular cd that the specifications were made available
| on is the July 1998 edition.
So we can only hope that the specs didnt change after that. Can we also
be sure of that? Is redistribution of these specs allowed?
| CD Number 2 of the three part set. The specs that were made available
| were the office 97 spefications.
So not the Office 2000 specs?
| Not the previous versions. The specs are quite hard to read, and often
Sound bad :-(
| Some fields are wrong, and some information is not fully correct, but
| theres nothing better available.
As a result I conclude:
- Actual specs are NOT available
- Specs that are available are seemingly not open and outdated
- The implementation seems to differ from the specs making them more or
So IMHO the MS-Office formats are not transparent but opaque according
to the FDL.
More information about the Discussion