On "A matter of privacy?"
Georg C. F. Greve
greve at gnu.org
Sat May 19 09:49:59 UTC 2001
One could probably say that it only goes to show that people make
mistakes when transcribing things, because - as you probably already
know - the OSD is derived from the Debian Free Software Guidelines
which are derived from the Free Software definition of the FSF. All
three were *meant* to describe the same licenses.
Personally I would probably say that it goes to show that the old
scientific principle to prefer the most compact definition still
But the real point is the question of privacy.
The Free Software definition says that you have the freedom to pass
something along. But that (of course) also includes the freedom to not
pass it along if you don't want to.
In the process of avoiding the term "freedom" at all costs, the OSD
obviously created an insecurity in the definition that made this
It has always been suspected that the OSD created loopholes. Apple was
apparently the first to find one. Congratulations. :)
FSF Europe, President
Georg C. F. Greve <greve at gnu.org>
Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org)
Brave GNU World (http://brave-gnu-world.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 268 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Discussion