A Linux Today story has been mailed to you!

Nobody nobody at linuxtoday.com
Wed May 16 13:06:29 UTC 2001

This message is sent to you from 
Linux Today (http://linuxtoday.com)
Georg C. F. Greve, greve at gnu.org has requested
that we send you this article.
You can find this story online at:
Georg C. F. Greve adds: FYI
The author gives a lot of reasons why we should speak of \"GNU/Linux\" and then concludes that he\'ll keep saying \"Linux\" because Linus told him to.


LinuxPlanet: The StartX Files:  Losing the Horizon
When a pilot "loses the horizon," it's a disorienting, unnerving experience that can mean real trouble without a calm head.  When Brian Proffitt got "the mail" from Richard Stallman asking that he adopt the phrase "GNU/Linux," he had the same feeling. Here he offers a history and examination of an old controversy, notes why RMS has a point, and explains that no matter where you land on this one, it's important to keep sight of the horizon.

Somewhere along this whole free software vs. open source timeline, Stallman decided that it would be just and proper for Linux (the operating system, not the kernel) to be renamed to GNU/Linux. This is a cause that, like many of his other beliefs, Stallman pursues with a tenacity and determination. This combination  

  tends to, frankly, piss people off. It could easily be said that many of the  

  objections to Stallman's arguments are knee-jerk reactions personality conflicts  

  and nothing more. 


But here is what Stallman wants: the chance to have credit for the FSF's GNU operating system, which he firmly believes was completed with the Linux kernel. And with that name change, the ability to promote the real enemy of Microsoft: the GNU Project and the GPL. 


That was the topic of the e-mail to me last week, in response to my column  

  last week arguing about providing Microsoft with a rational front. Along the  

  way, I teased the FSF about their tendency to e-mail everyone they can about  

  the importance of free software. I don't apologize for it; everyone could use  

  a gentle tweak on the nose from time to time, because people and organizations that take themselves too seriously are likely to implode under their own weight.

Still, I got what I deserved when Stallman wrote me to point out that Microsoft did not really fear Linux, but rather the GPL. He also asked me personally to begin to use the term GNU/Linux in my work. And that's where the abyss loomed. 


Complete Story
Related Stories:
FreeOS.com: To be or not to be: GNU / Linux?
(Feb 18, 2001)
What's in a Name? Richard Stallman on Linux vs. GNU/Linux(Oct 10, 2000)
Upside: My lunch with Richard(Aug 23, 2000)
Woot.net: On the topic of GNU/Linux: or, there are no linux distributions(Aug 29, 1999)
ZDNet: Evan Leibovitch -- What we have here is a failure to communicate...(May 17, 1999)
(The sender's internet address was

More information about the Discussion mailing list