brainstorming: which formats to use and which to avoid
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Wed Jun 20 11:50:36 UTC 2001
|| On 20 Jun 2001 12:04:26 +0100
|| MJ Ray <markj at cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
mr> I seem to recall that SSH Communications threw a fit over people using
mr> the (trademarked?) name of their product to describe compatible
I was not anymore aware of that. The claims are ridiculous but of
course we should use the term as used in the IETF draft.
Trademarking a standard protocol name effectivly makes that standard
useless.
Ciao,
Werner
--
Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus
More information about the Discussion
mailing list