brainstorming: which formats to use and which to avoid

Werner Koch wk at
Wed Jun 20 11:50:36 UTC 2001

 || On 20 Jun 2001 12:04:26 +0100
 || MJ Ray <markj at> wrote: 

 mr> I seem to recall that SSH Communications threw a fit over people using
 mr> the (trademarked?) name of their product to describe compatible

I was not anymore aware of that.  The claims are ridiculous but of
course we should use the term as used in the IETF draft.  

Trademarking a standard protocol name effectivly makes that standard



Werner Koch        Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH      et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions                                        -- Augustinus

More information about the Discussion mailing list