Economic Arguments for Free Software
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Mon Jul 9 14:47:57 UTC 2001
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:59:40PM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > http://www.freeos.com/articles/4087/
> Bernhard, one month ago:
> > [...]
> > Therefor we can find some arguments and nice analogies in there
> > to fight common mistakes about an economy of software has to work.
>
> It's interesting, but it has a serious problem: it only considers
> "open source" as charity work.
The author uses the suboptimal term for Free Software, but I
consider this a minor problem.
His aim of the article is:
Free Software makes sense
even if when there will not be a business model for it.
This is no statement about whether there is such a business model.
He does not answer yes or no only that no widely recognised one has been
found so far.
Consider the following quotes it makes a lot of sense to envision
that there is a business model for sure:
" Is it possible to make money off Open Source? In the light of all
that we have discussed, this now seems a rather petty and
inconsequential question to ask.
[..]
There is great wealth that will be created [..]
and very little of that will have anything to do with money.
[..]
this increase in the overall size of the
economic pie results in proportionately more wealth for all, then
that's the grand answer to our petty question
"
> While some is charity, more and more is not.
> The fact that it can either be charity or paid work is what makes
> the real difference, in my opinion.
There is also a difference between charity and getting other rewards.
The former is altruistic the latter not. He also talks about the latter.
Bernhard
--
Professional Service around Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20010709/02b7b28e/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list