Isnt one point of our argument that offering ONE choice (not just a non-free choice, but only one option) is agaisnt the law becuase its monopoly-ish. like you should have more than one web brouser etc?

Anna

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Matthias Kirschner <mk@fsfe.org> wrote:
Just a short note:

* Sam Tuke <samtuke@fsfe.org> [2011-10-03 13:03:02 +0100]:

> Having said all that, the Council will act on your suggestion and add text to
> clarify that other PDF readers are available.

That's good.

> However, we will not be linking to the PDFreaders.org site that you
> provided as we do not consider that it offers the genuine range of
> options that most site visitors would be interested in.

If they continue to just link to Adobe, it is an unfair competition
advantage. This way they will make sure this area will be a monopoly.

Regards,
Matthias

--
Matthias Kirschner - FSFE - Fellowship Coordinator, German Coordinator
FSFE, Linienstr. 141, 10115 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290 +49-1577-1780003
Free Software is important to you? Join today! (fsfe.org/join)
Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner)
_______________________________________________
Manchester mailing list
Manchester@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/manchester



--
"There is no satisfaction whatever at any time. There is only a queer, divine dissatisfaction; a blessed unrest that keeps us marching..."

Martha Graham