but HOW illigal is it? I mean, I got the idea that some european law meant it was LITERALLY illigal to only offer one browser etc. I remeber all the hype about how we would now all see mozilla on our library or whatever computer.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Matthias Kirschner mk@fsfe.org wrote:
- Anna Morris say.hello.to.anna@googlemail.com [2011-10-04 17:02:12
+0100]:
Isnt one point of our argument that offering ONE choice (not just a
non-free
choice, but only one option) is agaisnt the law becuase its monopoly-ish. like you should have more than one web brouser etc?
Yes, it is. Matthias
-- Matthias Kirschner - FSFE - Fellowship Coordinator, German Coordinator FSFE, Linienstr. 141, 10115 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290 +49-1577-1780003 Free Software is important to you? Join today! (fsfe.org/join) Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner)