On Friday 29 October 2010 11:54:20 Maelle Costa wrote:
On 10/29/2010 11:54 AM, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
We always tried to mention Adobe, but wrote about non-free PDF readers.
*not* to mention Adobe ;)
Reagrds
Yeah, I tought about that. But then again, I think in this E-Mail a main argument was "we would advertise your product over one product of a competitor -- if yours is Free Software". I thought naming things made that more obvious. And I thought this was ok, since it is not public communication. Or do you think I should be more careful?
OTOH I still think its possible, that Chrome actually uses Adobe code for the plugin. Remember that Google got Adobe to support WebM and HTML5. Shortly thereafter they announced shipping Flash with Chrome and now the plugin appeared out of nowhere… there could have been a deal.