(Hjälp oss att nå ut till människor på deras modersmål. Gå med i vårt svenska översättningsteam: http://fsfe.org/contribute/translators/.)
= FSFE Newsletter - May 2011 =
[Read online: http://fsfe.org/news/nl/nl-201105.sv.html ]
== Competition authorities: Free Software protects competition ==
882 software patents, likely related to GNU/Linux, in the hands of people who could use them to pressure Free Software companies and developers? Maybe in the hands of Microsoft, which has for years used nebulous patent claims to extract licensing fees from companies that use the Linux kernel in their products. This month the German and the US competition authorities approved the sale of those patents to CPTN, a consortium consisting of Microsoft, Oracle, Apple, and EMC. But, barring nasty surprises in the still to be published detailed decision, we neutralised the danger for Free Software.
Software patents are a very complex matter, and competition authorities are not used dealing with them. So beginning from December 2010 we explained to the German competition authorities why the patent sale was highly problematic. In our first[1] , and second[2] submission we explained the mechanics that some companies use to compete in the software market, and how they preserve their monopolies. 1. http://fsfe.org/projects/swpat/letter-20101222.sv.html 2. http://fsfe.org/projects/swpat/letter-20110406.sv.html
In their press release the authorities have not only highlighted the importance of Free Software for competition, and that actual patent lawsuits are anticompetitive but also that threatening with patent lawsuits, like the fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) strategies from some non-free software companies, can be anticompetitive.
So for the first time, competition authorities have acknowledged the essential part of Free Software for competition, and that patent lawsuits by dominant market participants can be anticompetitive. This will also be important for future debates, when the behaviour of big non-free software companies has to be evaluated from a competition law perspective.
As the devil is in the details, we hope to hear about the exact wording of the CPTN contracts to evaluate them[3] . Such work is very time consuming, and we would not be able to keep track of those activities, without the support of one time donations[4] and regular ones by our Fellows[5] . 3. http://fsfe.org/projects/swpat/novell-cptn.sv.html 4. http://fsfe.org/donate/donate.sv.html 5. http://fsfe.org/join.sv.html
== Mission is possible ==
To date, 17 percent of the public institutions, we contacted[6] , already replied and removed the non-free PDF reader advertisements from their websites. The current progress of the campaign can be seen on our buglist[7] . Until now we have only received one negative reply. However, as about 83 percent of the contacted institutions have not responded yet, we want to remind them about the letter we have sent, and ask for a reply. This works only with your help. To take part, follow the actions from our follow-up guide[8] . In short this is: 6. http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/pdfreaders.sv.html 7. http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/buglist.sv.html 8. http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/follow-up.sv.html
- have a look at organisations in your country which appear as not having answered yet,
- contact and remind them of FSFE's letter on inadmissibility of advertising of proprietary software by public institutions, and
- ask them to remove the proprietary software advertising from their websites. If you discover non-free PDF reader advertisement, and is not on our list, you are encouraged to contact them on your own. For public institutions use a modified version of our letter[9] , for companies and non-profits we are working on a template, after volunteers have convinced organisations like Greenpeace Germany[10] to link to pdfreaders.org instead. 9. http://fsfe.org/campaigns/pdfreaders/letter.en.html 10. http://www.greenpeace.de/themen/energie/nachrichten/artikel/deutschlands_ene...
== Something completely different ==
- Data stored per-user, and under the user's control. That is the aim of the unhosted web. This project is covered by this month Fellowship interview with Michiel de Jong[11] . If you want to discuss this in person with Michiel, he will help as one of our booth volunteers for one day during Berlin's Linuxtag[12] .
- Free Software for the public sector: We have provided input for the European Commission on modernising the way in which public bodies buy software[13] and related services.
- At the moment fellows are starting new Fellowship groups[14] in Augsburg[15] (Germany) and Manchester[16] (UK). For the Manchester group our British coordinator Sam Tuke created a good presentation template about the Fellowship which is now linked from the meeting howto[17] .
- Noteworthy articles from the Fellowship planet[18] include:
- Timo Jyrinki's article about his presentation of "tuning an old but free phone"[19] with corresponding videos from FSCONS[20] ,
- Carlo Piana's article "Doors opened at Openoffice"[21] about Oracle's announcement that they want to make OpenOffice.org a community developed project,
- and Lena Simon's article about the old myths in a digital society[22] (German) which also covers some issues we have to explain often. 11. http://losca.blogspot.com/2011/04/tuning-old-but-free-phone-video-now.sv.htm... 12. http://www.fscons.org 13. http://piana.eu/it/node/265 14. http://www.stud.uni-potsdam.de/~leena/2011/04/alte-mythen-in-der-digitalen-g...
- Groklaw's well deserved pension. Groklaw is shutting down and like our sister organisation[23] we would like to thank them for their good work.
- Free Software licensing, Free Software business, software patents, and other topics from a legal point of view are covered in Matija's Free Software and law related links. Editions are available for 29.03.-17.04.[24] , 18.04.-24.04.[25] , and 25.04.-29.04.[26] . 15. http://blogs.fsfe.org/fellowship-interviews/?p=299 16. http://wiki.fsfe.org/FellowshipEvents/Linuxtag%20berlin 17. http://fsfe.org/news/2011/news-20110418-01.sv.html 18. http://wiki.fsfe.org/groups/ 19. http://wiki.fsfe.org/groups/Augsburg 20. http://wiki.fsfe.org/groups/Manchester 21. http://wiki.fsfe.org/MeetingHowTo#General 22. http://planet.fsfe.org 23. http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/farewell-groklaw-and-thanks 24. http://matija.suklje.name/?q=node/239 25. http://matija.suklje.name/?q=node/241 26. http://matija.suklje.name/?q=node/244
== Get Active - Internships at FSFE ==
We are looking for smart, motivated interns to join our team[27] . Apply for an internship position[28] yourself, or distribute the information about it. We offer: 27. http://fsfe.org/about/team.sv.html 28. http://fsfe.org/contribute/internship.sv.html
- a challenging and exciting time with a dynamic NPO working internationally,
- a close-up view of organisational and community processes,
- a chance to take the initiative and put your ideas into practice, and
- the opportunity to meet and work with Free Software advocates across Europe. Beside the current interns Natalia Evdokimova[29] , and Nicolas Jean[30] , past interns include our Italian coordinator Giacomo Poderi[31] , Fellowship representative Hugo Roy[32] , our president Karsten Gerloff[33] , UK coordinator Sam Tuke[34] , Swedish team member Stian Rødven Eide[35] , education team coordinator Thomas Jensch[36] , and your editor[37] , who was FSFE's first intern. So as you can see, the internship is a good start to get more involved in FSFE. 29. http://fsfe.org/index.sv.html 30. http://fsfe.org/about/jean/jean.sv.html 31. http://blogs.fsfe.org/poderi/ 32. http://fsfe.org/about/roy/roy.sv.html 33. http://fsfe.org/about/gerloff/gerloff.sv.html 34. http://fsfe.org/about/tuke/tuke.sv.html 35. http://blogs.fsfe.org/julipan/ 36. http://blogs.fsfe.org/riepernet/ 37. http://fsfe.org/about/kirschner/kirschner.sv.html
Regards, Matthias Kirschner - FSFE