On 7 Apr 2012, at 09:37, Simon Ward wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 04:45:47PM +0100, Sam Tuke wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2012 14:27:22 Simon Ward wrote:
I can get equally annoyed by GNU/Linux users who claim similar. ;)
Is "virtually immune" reasonable to say when talking to Windows users? "Relatively immune" breaks the definition a bit too much.
I like the introduction on the Wikipedia page for “Linux malware”[1]:
“very well‐protected, but not immune”
I wrote a little on the background to why Unix-like operating systems tend to be more secure even assuming as many software defects as Windows: http://webmink.com/2012/02/27/is-windows-to-blame-for-viruses/
S.