On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Stefan Kangas <skangas(a)skangas.se> wrote:
>> Unfree speech OR Free beer
>
> You are correct!
>
>> you shouldn't have to choose between the two ;-)
>
> This specific conclusion is wrong, however. The disjunction is
> inclusive, not exclusive. You CAN have both! ;-)
Right, but very few would want free beer at the cost
of unfree speech (it wouldn't be free if it had a cost,
so, in a way, it translates into exclusivity ;-) or
a contradiction )
>> Sorry for the rant, I couldn't help myself ;-)
>
> Thanks for spotting this mistake!
>
I actually had fun spotting it ^^
And, no I wasn't serioius, I just felt we could
take out the "opposite" word :D
Peace and love!
Rikard