http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/14/business/EU-FIN-EU-Music-Royalties...
As European Commissioner for Internal Market, McCreevy wants to extend copyright from 50 years to 95 years. His reason? People are now living longer.
You couldn't make it up. He says he wants to ensure that teen artists can rely on their work providing them a pension.
Trying to cast this as supporting the little guy, he says that it will support session musicians who played backing music.
He also talks about increasing the taxes on blank media. This is something I think we could agree to. There's lots of room for arguing about the numbers and how to distribute the collected taxes, but as systems go, this one doesn't harm people's rights to help themselves or to help others.
This is probably related to the EC's public consultation on "Creative Content Online", which has a deadline of Feb 29th: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm
I'm going to look into that early next week and will discuss it here. It might be something worth drafting an IFSO response to.
I think this is a case where we should have some give and take.
Give him the extra 45 years copyright he's asking for in art/music/litriture, etc, and reduce the copyright on computer code by 45 years to 5 years.
I believe Iraq used to have a very enlightened copyright law. Their copyrights expired after 20 years IIRC.
Rory
On 2/15/08, Ciaran O'Riordan ciaran@fsfe.org wrote:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/14/business/EU-FIN-EU-Music-Royalties...
As European Commissioner for Internal Market, McCreevy wants to extend copyright from 50 years to 95 years. His reason? People are now living longer.
You couldn't make it up. He says he wants to ensure that teen artists can rely on their work providing them a pension.
Trying to cast this as supporting the little guy, he says that it will support session musicians who played backing music.
He also talks about increasing the taxes on blank media. This is something I think we could agree to. There's lots of room for arguing about the numbers and how to distribute the collected taxes, but as systems go, this one doesn't harm people's rights to help themselves or to help others.
This is probably related to the EC's public consultation on "Creative Content Online", which has a deadline of Feb 29th: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm
I'm going to look into that early next week and will discuss it here. It might be something worth drafting an IFSO response to.
-- Ciarán O'Riordan (+32 477 36 44 19) \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ Join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ fsfe-ie@fsfeurope.org mailing list List information: http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/fsfe-ie Public archive: https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-ie
"Rory Browne" rbmlist@gmail.com writes:
Give him the extra 45 years copyright he's asking for in art/music/litriture, etc, and reduce the copyright on computer code by 45 years to 5 years.
We probably won't get to have that discussion since the Berne Convention fixes the minimum copyright term to 50 years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Literary...
And TRIPS says that computer programs are to be covered by the Berne Convention. (Which is good for us because it means that TRIPS does not regard innovations in computer programs as technical inventions which would have to be patentable.)
I just ran across this interview with rapper Shaggy on WIPO's website: http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2007/06/article_0003.html
He seems to contradict himself a bit, but his description of the music industry implies that the current corporations should be weakened, and that it was an absense of copyright (before 1993) that fostered music in Jamaica.
On 2/15/08, Ciaran O'Riordan ciaran@fsfe.org wrote:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/14/business/EU-FIN-EU-Music-Royalties...
As European Commissioner for Internal Market, McCreevy wants to extend copyright from 50 years to 95 years. His reason? People are now living longer.
You couldn't make it up. He says he wants to ensure that teen artists can rely on their work providing them a pension.
I thought copyrights were a regulatory intervention designed to promote innovation, not a pension fund for people who haven't produced anything since their teenage years.
I can't see a teen artist deciding against a rock 'n roll lifestyle because they are concerned about pension prospects.
Maybe "Free-market champion fights to extend monopolies, again" might be appropriate. Or was that done during swpat?
John
On 15/02/2008, Ciaran O'Riordan ciaran@fsfe.org wrote:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/14/business/EU-FIN-EU-Music-Royalties...
As European Commissioner for Internal Market, McCreevy wants to extend copyright from 50 years to 95 years. His reason? People are now living longer.
You couldn't make it up. He says he wants to ensure that teen artists can rely on their work providing them a pension.
Trying to cast this as supporting the little guy, he says that it will support session musicians who played backing music.
He also talks about increasing the taxes on blank media. This is something I think we could agree to. There's lots of room for arguing about the numbers and how to distribute the collected taxes, but as systems go, this one doesn't harm people's rights to help themselves or to help others.
This is probably related to the EC's public consultation on "Creative Content Online", which has a deadline of Feb 29th: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm
I'm going to look into that early next week and will discuss it here. It might be something worth drafting an IFSO response to.
The aricle is pretty bizarre. McCreevy says about the singers
"These royalties are often their sole pension."
The royalties don't currently exist so anybody who expects them to be their pension is not living in reality. It's a bit like me saying that company X will be my sole pension, despite the fact that they don't have a pension scheme. There is no obligation on company X to suddenly produce this pension scheme for me just because I'm an idiot.
The other thing I thought was hilarious was
"McCreevy said the new rules should not increase consumer prices because the price of records out of copyright is often the same as — or higher than — that of newly released discs."
If that's not a spectacular failure of the free market and copyright law then I don't know what is. When copyright expires it's _supposed_ to make the works more available to the public. He says this isn't happening but instead of trying to fix this he uses this failure as an excuse to guarantee that the works will not be freed up,
F
-- Ciarán O'Riordan (+32 477 36 44 19) \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ Join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ fsfe-ie@fsfeurope.org mailing list List information: http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/fsfe-ie Public archive: https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-ie
Hi all,
Ar 15.02.08 12:45, Scríobh Ciaran O'Riordan:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/14/business/EU-FIN-EU-Music-Royalties...
As European Commissioner for Internal Market, McCreevy wants to extend copyright from 50 years to 95 years. His reason? People are now living longer.
This article might be useful for people looking into this issue: http://wiki.lessig.org/index.php/Against_perpetual_copyright
David