Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
So, do I suggest Ian Clarkes rewording for the definition of "protection defeating device":
"which has only a limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a rights protection measure to facilitate the infringement of copyright law"
Does this sentence seem a bit clumsy to anyone else? Perhaps I am just a perfectionist.
What about:
"which has a limited purpose or use other than to facilitate the infringement of copyright law through circumvention of a rights protection measure".
I have removed "commercially significant" as I can't for the life of me see what that phrase achieves.
Ian.