FSFE-IE January 2006

fsfe-ie@lists.fsfe.org

11 participants
24 discussions

Re: [Fsfe-ie] Re: Free Software event on 20th December
by A.J.Delaney＠brighton.ac.uk 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 22:53 +0000, Ciaran O'Riordan wrote: > Brian Cleland <brian_cleland(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > Here are the attachments in a more gnu-friendly format! > > unfortunately OOo 1.1 shows these two .odt documents as blank, but it opens > the Word documents fine :-/ You'll need OOo 1.5+ or 2.0+ for ODT files. OOo 1.0-1.4 support the sxw file format which is largely similar to odt, however odt is the new standard Open Document Format (ODF) file format. -- Aidan Delaney Lecturer, School of Computing, Mathematics and Information Sciences, University of Brighton.

1 0

Article in today's FT about iris recognition patent
by Ben North 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

There is an article on p9 of today's London Financial Times with the headline "Eyes reopening to the benefits of biometrics", by Maija Palmer. It starts The market for creating biometric identification technology using the human iris is set to see rapid growth next year, thanks to the expiry of a patent that has stifled development over the past 20 years. The idea of using the iris as a way to identify people was discovered in the mid-1980s by US-based ophthalmologists Leonard Flom and Aran Safir, who patented the concept and created a company known today as Iridian Technologies. [This is the excerpt available at http://news.ft.com/cms/s/65143ac6-7e58-11da-8ef9-0000779e2340.html without having to subscribe.] It goes on to claim that Iridian was very aggressive at defending its patent rights; "any business that so much as looked into iris recognition was warned off by Iridian's lawyers". The article goes on to comment on the rapid growth of competition in the field since the US expiry of the patent, with many new companies releasing products. Iridian's CTO is reported as saying that the patent was both a blessing and a curse --- many potential clients, particularly governments, were reluctant to do business with the only supplier of a technology. As well as the worries about Iridian's stability as a company, "they worried ... that in the absence of competition the technology was not as highly developed as it could have been." The rest of the articles talks about the possibility that with new suppliers emerging, the technology might well see more widespread use. The general impression I got of the article was that the patent system did not do its job here --- a broad patent on a "concept" was granted and competition in the field, and therefore public accessibility to the technology, suffered greatly. I would claim that iris recognition would count as a "software patent" --- there is nothing too difficult in the physical realm of capturing the image. It is not a trivial one (like Microsoft's "is not" patent), yet here is a case where it did not result in increased availability of innovation to the public. The arguments and situation are probably equally applicable to non-software patents as well, i.e., this is more an "anti-patent" data point than an "anti-software-patent" data point, but I thought it interesting that the FT was so negative about the effects of the patent here. (The iris recognition algorithm and ideas are pretty cool --- John Daugman's website http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/jgd1000/ has details. I went to a seminar a few years ago where he presented the ideas and it was very interesting stuff.) Worth sending on to FFII if anyone has suitable contact information? Ben.

1 0

IFSO Wiki updates
by IfsoWiki＠ifso.ie 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

1 0

Plone users?
by teresahackett＠eircom.net 02 Jan '06

02 Jan '06

If there are any Plone users in the Dublin area, who would be kind enough to offer a tutorial, please shoot me a mail off-list. Thanks! Teresa

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

FSFE-IE January 2006