On 25 Oct 2003 at 18:36, Moritz Sinn wrote:
> i've a question: lets say i write some software (e.g. with perl) that
> works web based (all you need to use that software is a proper
> webbrowser). now lets say i publish it under GPL. If now someone
> downloads the code and changes it and then puts it on his webserver so
> that everyone can use it there, does he have to publish the changes
> under GPL? I mean, its clear that if someone changes it and then pass
> the changed program on, he has to publish that version under GPL. but
> if he doesn't pass it on, if he just makes it useable, but it runs on
> his own webserver, is that the same? All he does is modifying the code
> and running that version on his public webserver.
>
> Would be nice if someone could explain me why he has to publish it
> under GPL or why not.
As Ciaran has said, if his derived work does not leave the server
then he isn't distributing it and thus doesn't need to release the
source. I, unlike the FSF, don't see a problem with that as he
couldn't give it to anyone else so there's no real risk for
commercial exploitation.
If he is distributing it, he must distribute all parts of the
software in source form and must attach GPL license notices
unmodified etc etc. However, his extensions may not need to be also
under the GPL depending on certain factors, but whatever license he
does use must be compatible with GPL stipulations.
The GNU FAQ on the GPL is good on this, I'd only disagree with the
GPL applying across a binary boundary (ie; I can't see why a
commercial program can't use a GPL shared library).
Cheers,
Niall