Dear Jonas and Bjorn,

Thank you for sending and for uploading in Keybase the updated version aimed for usage scenario 1 and 2 (O2-A1_Content Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_1_and_2.odt) and the updated version aimed for usage scenario 3 (filename "O2-A1_Content Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_3.pdf").

Can you please indicate the difference between the two texts provided? It is not clear to me what are the changes incorporated. In particular, I could not identify the modifications, based on the remarks of the 2nd Peer Review (by Sivan). Also, some parts have no images, so I kindly ask you to add a few, as we need to provide a uniform result.

Which brings me to my main point. The unit you provided contains very useful information, but it is too “academic”. Please consider the feedback provided from Sivan in view of a more unified and consistent training course. I would like to remind you that this is a VET level project/training course and that the target audience is mainly EU SMEs with little or no experience in FOSS, which we understand is not your usual audience. From the coordinator’s point of view, we consider it is necessary that you modify your contribution, as at the moment it stands out as an outlier.

Thank you for sharing with us your deep knowledge in the field. As an EU SME with little experience with FOSS ourselves, we have been learning a lot throughout the course of the FOSS4SMEs project. I am looking forward to your feedback.

Best regards,
Katerina

Στις Πέμ, 28 Φεβ 2019 στις 3:14 μ.μ., ο/η Jonas Gamalielsson <jonas.gamalielsson@his.se> έγραψε:

Dear Katerina,

After consideration of review comments (in all review rounds), please
find an updated version aimed for usage scenario 1 and 2 (O2-A1_Content
Unit 4_v5_for_usage_scenario_1_and_2.odt) and an updated version aimed
for usage scenario 3 (filename "O2-A1_Content Unit
4_v5_for_usage_scenario_3.pdf") in the following folder of the Keybase
platform:

"K:\team\foss4smes\2. Implementation\Outputs\Output 2\A1 Training course
contents\Peer Review - 2nd round\After Peer Review"

We also attach the files to this email.

Please advise us when we can go ahead with our conduct of assessment
according to usage scenario 3 as detailed in the guidelines in the
document "O2/A4 assessment methodology and tools" (see
K:\team\foss4smes\2. Implementation\Outputs\Output 2\A4
Assessment\O2_A4_assessment_description_v2.pdf) and in the FOSS4SMEs
minutes from the telco on 19 February 2019 (K:\team\foss4smes\5.
Meetings\Telcos\FOSS4SMEs_Minutes_20190219.pdf).

From past experiences and dialogues with SMEs, we find that it is very
important to give them as much calender time as possible for the
assessments. Therefore, we find that it is now urgent that each partner
can proceed with step 1 (of the five steps) as detailed in section "5.
Guidelines" in the document "O2/A4 assessment methodology and tools".

Best
Jonas & Björn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonas Gamalielsson, PhD

Software Systems Research Group
Informatics Research Specialisation
University of Skövde
P.O. Box 408
SE-541 28 SKÖVDE
SWEDEN
Office: Portalen, floor 4, room 410r
Tel: +46 (0)500-448375
Fax: +46 (0)500-416325
Email: jonas.gamalielsson@his.se
Web: http://www.his.se/gamj
----------------------------------------------------------------------

	Katerina Tsinari
	EU Projects consultant
	Αntoni Tritsi 21, 570 01 Thessaloniki
	T:	2310 233 266
	Email:	tsinari@abe.gr
	URL:	www.abe.gr
	Skype:	tsinarikaterina@hotmail.de