Dear partners,
I'm sending here below the link for our 18th month Quality Review survey.
The results will be presented on the occasion of our last meeting in
Brussels, as already done for the previous stages.
* https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RT88XKT
Please answer it by the end of this week.
Thank you!
Best regards,
<http://www.dlearn.eu/>
Francesco Agresta
European Project Manager
European Digital Learning Network
Via Domenico Scarlatti, 30
20124 Milano
Mob. +39 3496027623
Email <mailto:francesco.agresta@dlearn.eu> francesco.agresta(a)dlearn.eu
<http://www.dlearn.eu/> www.dlearn.eu
Dear Max,
its nice to have you back again. Thank you for your questions. You will
find my answers between your lines marked in blue.
I hope I clarified everything. In case you have further questions, dont
hesitate to contact me.
By the way, thank you so much for supporting Francesco in this urgent
impact task. Great work.
Best,
Katerina
Στις Τετ, 26 Ιουν 2019 στις 7:07 μ.μ., ο/η Max Mehl <max.mehl(a)fsfe.org>
έγραψε:
> Dear Katerina,
>
> Thanks for the updates. Sivan, Galia and I have been a bit confused about
> review tasks in O2:
>
> ~ Katerina Tsinari [2019-06-24 13:28 +0200]:
> > *Peer Review of** O2/A1 Training Plan by OFE+FSFE: *to be completed the
> > latest by 05.07
>
> Do you see any benefit in reviewing a document which sets the ground for
> the work that already has been reviewed by us? I would suggest to mark this
> as done. Any edits by OFE and FSFE won't have any practical influence as
> the actual work already has been done, discussed, and agreed on.
>
--> You are right that is document was supposed to be developed before the
training content in 11.18. This is not my decision, but TUD insisted to
deliver this later and I am sorry that I didnt manage to have it sooner. It
was not possible due to multiple delays of all partners. The problem now
is, that there are many grammar and spelling mistakes inside the Training
Plan, which is one of the main deliverables of O2. I can mark this review
as done as soon as you send me the special template filled out. I mean the
one described in the process in the Qualit Plan: "the result will be
evaluated considering formal aspects, like comprehensiveness, clarity and
completeness". If you choose not to, then its your decision. The influence
your review can have, is that we can correct the mistakes I mentioned in
the document, which should be sent to me in an updated version by tonight.
>
> > *Platfrom Design Plan*: Is in Keybase: K:\team\foss4smes\2.>
> Implementation\Outputs\Output 2\A3 Distance Learning Platform. à Peer
> Review from FSFE and OFE by 28.06. Do you refer to "Design plan for the
> distant learning platform" of O2/A3 which should have been finished in
> 12.18 according to the latest MCE plan (A2_Management and Coordination
> Plan_v.15.pdf in Keybase, page 16)?
>
--> Yes, I do.
> If so, N. 49 states that OFE and FSFE are peer reviewing O2/A3 which
> contains this design plan as well as "Development and customisation of
> the platform", "Content import and management support", and "Testing".
> *BUT* the responsibility column states that OFE and FSFE have to do the
> "Final test" and not a review of all steps (so unlike O2/A1).
>
--> I wrote only the word "Final testing", because I couldnt write more
inside this box of the table. The tabe is just a graphical display of what
is written n the MCE Plan in detail, trying to give you a quick overview of
all the tasks. Again here, we need to follow the same Peer Review process
as usually. The "Design Plan" document is a deliverable of O2 and has many
mistakes, like for example needs to be formatted according to our
deliverable templates etc. So I will need you to do this sooner or later. I
explained in our last telco, that from now on I am starting to ask you to
Peer Review single tasks of activities, as waiting for a whole activity to
be finished and to review it as a whole, is not possible anymore in this
project. The delays we are currently facing are not allowing us to proceed
like this anymore. You were not in the telco, so you missed this info.
>
> Since we moved O2/A2 (translations) to after O2/A3, I think we only have
> to review it in depth as soon as everything is finished.
>
--> O2/A2 should start in July for all team members as soon as I let you
know. O2/A3 will be completed from each partner independantly: Design Plan
and development of the platform is ready by ATL, Contet import and testing
will be done from each colleague alone in his own translated course (FSFE,
DLEARN, ALT and maybe SKUNI if they choose to translate as well). O2/A4
should then be completed before the meeting in Brussels. This means that
the Peer Review in O2/A3 is only the Design Plan document (now) and the
Moodle Platform as a whole (the second one I will check with Ifigeneia how
we do it - maybe in September).
>
> Interestingly, N. 67 also states that FSFE and OFE are doing the
> Evaluation of the Final release (O2/A5). It's a bit unclear to us how
> this is different from the other evaluation we're doing beforehand though.
>
--> Please read the proposal to understand the differences among the
activities of O2. This has to do with the implementation of the feedback
received in O2/A4 and is as a result another evaluation. When we are there,
we will see how we will handle this activity. We will find a solution that
fits everyone, since all partners are involved in this activity before u do
the review.
>
> Best,
> Max
>
> --
> Max Mehl - Programme Manager - Free Software Foundation Europe
> Contact and information: https://fsfe.org/about/mehl | @mxmehl
> Become a supporter of software freedom: https://fsfe.org/join
>
--
[image: atlantis-logo-for-signatures]
*Katerina Tsinari*
*EU Projects consultant*
*Αntoni Tritsi 21, 570 01 Thessaloniki*
*T:*
*2310 233 266*
*Email:*
*tsinari(a)abe.gr <elsianli(a)abe.gr>*
*URL:*
*www.abe.gr <http://www.abe.gr/>*
*Skype:*
* tsinarikaterina(a)hotmail.de <tsinarikaterina(a)hotmail.de>*
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlantis-engineering-sa>
<https://twitter.com/EngAtlantis>
<https://www.facebook.com/Atlantis-Engineering-SA-141993602518655>
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/112248896999799346483>
Dear partners,
I'm sending here the links for three impact surveys we are supposed to send
out and have filled in during these final months until the end of the
project.
They relate to three different target groups:
1. SMEs
https://foss4smes.limequery.com/1?lang=en
2. VET Centres, Trainers and Coaches7
https://foss4smes.limequery.com/2?lang=en
3. Project partners (i.e. ourselves)
https://foss4smes.limequery.com/3?lang=en
The fourth target group to be surveyed will be "Other stakeholders" (e.g.
policy makers in digital education). They will be part of a "formal
consultation based on Intellectual Output 3", which is still under
development.
However, this fourth group will be most probably approached exploiting the
occasion of the final conference in Brussels.
In addition, please find attached a template for the collection of SMEs case
studies showcasing the participants experience and improved performance. We
are supposed to collect 5 case studies per partner, 30 in total.
These activities relate to the "Impact" strategy described at page 62-63 of
the proposal.
I have started updating the Quality Plan accordingly with all the necessary
information (you will find it in keybase), and it will be finalised as soon
as we are done also with the 4th target group and the self-diagnostic tool
(which is supposed to depict the "before" situation about participants).
Please have a look at the surveys and we will discuss them during our
monthly call coming next Tuesday.
Wish you a nice weekend,
<http://www.dlearn.eu/>
Francesco Agresta
European Project Manager
European Digital Learning Network
Via Domenico Scarlatti, 30
20124 Milano
Mob. +39 3496027623
Email <mailto:francesco.agresta@dlearn.eu> francesco.agresta(a)dlearn.eu
<http://www.dlearn.eu/> www.dlearn.eu