Stefan Meretz stefan.meretz@hbv.org writes:
The point is not whether those tricks base on artificial restraints or not. The point is how to deal with scarcity? Software is always scarce (especially good one).
No, software is never scarce, but the skills to create it and many of the associated products are, so naturally they have a price to their consumers. Again, I see no contradiction.
But what does your defense mean??? Do you support ESR's trial to extend a-logic into the field of free software? I am confused.
No, but I say that his options basically break down into either artificial restraints on Freedom (ie non-Free software) or selling associated items which are naturally scarce. Neither of these extend your a-logic into Free Software.
Maybe I'm mad, but I've never really seen a contradiction between Free Software and natural market economics. The problems with software seem to be largely caused by the artificial restraints and the monopolistic positions it requires. I'm always slightly amazed that these activities are enshrined in most laws.
MJ Ray wrote:
Stefan Meretz stefan.meretz@hbv.org writes:
The point is not whether those tricks base on artificial restraints or not. The point is how to deal with scarcity? Software is always scarce (especially good one).
No, software is never scarce, but the skills to create it and many of the associated products are, so naturally they have a price to their consumers. Again, I see no contradiction.
No, software is sometimes scarce. Standard software is readily available and freely copyable, so it's not scarse. But special-purpose software is scarse if it doesn't exist yet and you have to write it or get someone to write it for you. And while flexible libraries, tools, etc. make it easier to write special-pupose software, there will be much need for special-purpose software at least for quite some time to come.
Frank
Hi MJ,
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:26:38PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Maybe I'm mad, but I've never really seen a contradiction between Free Software and natural market economics.
Now what may be "natural market economics"? In which way is the notion of a market "natural"?
Regards Lutz