From: Frank Heckenbach frank@g-n-u.de
Then you are a much better maintainer than the ones I have been in contact with....
Did it ever occur to you that this might be related to your style? If you constantly attack each and everything that comes to mind, and at the same time take any criticism of your statements as personal offense, it's rather hard to discuss anything with you constructively. (Of course, I don't know if your debates with those moderators were similar to this discussion, so my assumption may be wrong.)
I describe bugs (I don't attack), but then people come and tell me that everything is OK because this is a GNU system. If people regret to live with facts, what should I do?
It's you who permanently criticizes other systems, most of the time without giving concrete examples. Maybe you have some points, but without telling them, it's hard for us to see them. This way you can only convince people who share your views already.
absolutely wrong!
It is people like you who constantly citisize me because I am not using the system they know. Just start learning....
Jörg
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1 schilling@fokus.gmd.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
FOKUS at CeBIT Hall 11, A14 - BerliOS at CeBIT Hall 11 D11 (Future Market)
Meet me at CeBIT in Hall 11 D11 on the BerliOS booth - www.berlios.de
Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Frank Heckenbach frank@g-n-u.de
Then you are a much better maintainer than the ones I have been in contact with....
Did it ever occur to you that this might be related to your style? If you constantly attack each and everything that comes to mind, and at the same time take any criticism of your statements as personal offense, it's rather hard to discuss anything with you constructively. (Of course, I don't know if your debates with those moderators were similar to this discussion, so my assumption may be wrong.)
I describe bugs (I don't attack), but then people come and tell me that everything is OK because this is a GNU system. If people regret to live with facts, what should I do?
For a start, maybe present these facts. I can only tell from this discussion, but the problem is that you exactly don't describe most of the bugs you mention. You talk like you assume that everyone else shares your experiences and views of the problems.
As for attack, you certainly did. Should I really try to quote all the attacks and offenses against persons and projects you've made in this thread? They all can be read in the archives ...
It's you who permanently criticizes other systems, most of the time without giving concrete examples. Maybe you have some points, but without telling them, it's hard for us to see them. This way you can only convince people who share your views already.
absolutely wrong!
It is people like you who constantly citisize me because I am not using the system they know. Just start learning....
Are you trolling? The mail quoted was my first mail in this thread, so what exactly do you mean by "constantly"? Secondly, I made it quite clear that I was only criticizing your style, i.e. your way of arguing here. I didn't criticize you for using or not using any system at all ...
Frank