Patrick Ohnewein patrick.ohnewein@lugbz.org wrote:
If I get it right, the user grands all freedoms to YouTube. If he uses a free content license he would grant the freedoms to everyone not just to YouTube.
Where is the problem?
One that I spotted: it is not possible to copyleft/GPL/ShareAlike anything on YouTube reliably, as YouTube can sublicense under whatever terms they want if it promotes themselves.
Calling that fine for free content is similar to saying that only being able to use BSD-style terms reliably would be fine for free software: it's technically true in one way, but hides some big issues.
Hope that explains,