Alex Hudson wrote:
Ah, I think we're talking at cross-purposes - while debian-legal is quite US-oriented, I understand that. I was talking more about our discussion on this list, though obviously you are mostly informed on this issue by the discussion on debian-legal.
I am not discussing the wider issue on this list. It should be pretty clear that I was adding a summary and references about the debian discussion mentioned by AKFoerster. http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/2005-April/004959.html
I then replied to your (inaccurate, IMO, maybe because it was ignoring the laws different contributors were worrying about) commentary, which I probably shouldn't have done.
Even so, you seem to be making a habit of incredible claims.