On Monday 20. June 2016 17.25.53 Tomasz Nitecki wrote:
On 20/06/16 14:14, Erik Grun wrote:
Another thing that bugs me is AMD. Do they have something similar to Intels Damagement Engine?
I'm afraid they do. It's called 'AMD Platform Security Processor' [1].
Here is a link to previous discussion about this topic:
http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/2016-April/010912.html
For lower-end systems, I've already mentioned things like EOMA-68 in my blog, and it does appear that this will now start crowd-funding in the near future:
http://rhombus- tech.net/community_ideas/micro_desktop/news/Parabola_GNU_Linux_and_XFCE4_running_on_EOMA68_A20/
The relevance here is that EOMA-68 has prioritised chipsets that are supportable using only Free Software and which don't require opaque, proprietary binaries. Indeed, I believe that the initiative aims to get FSF certification, which in this case means a rather strict attitude towards "firmware" bundled with the kernel.
The previous discussion on this list mentioned a lack of alternatives for high-end computing. EOMA-68 doesn't really intersect with that since one of its goals was to enforce a low power budget.
Paul