"Lutz" == Lutz Horn lh@lutz-horn.de writes:
What might be better is a simple webpage with distributions categorized by the following criteria:
a) Consists entirely of Free Software
b) Free-Software-only version is available
c) Can be turned into Free-Software-only without too much of a hassle
d) Difficult or impossible to use without non-free software
Lutz> This should include the way updates for packages are provided and Lutz> which tools are needed to add them to the system. As far as I know Lutz> even SuSE uses RPM these days put adding updated RPMs to the Lutz> system _not_ using yast could be a little bit of a problem.
Maybe better classifications would be:
c) Includes non-free packages that can be easily removed
and
d) Uses non-free software as an integral part of the distribution itself
Gruß, Lars