Gentlemen and ladies, Independently of who is right and who is wrong in this long and annoying discussion, instead of back and forth, can the legal representative of FSFE answer to these questions once for all pls?
The legal representative in this case is the president from whom l haven't seen a simple feedback in these endless threads.
Plsbe lenient and do your duty for the sake of clarity.
I'd appreciate if people stop flaming also because most of these responses back and forth are non sense to me.
Stefan
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, 08:51 Sam Liddicott, sam@liddicott.com wrote:
I love how you trimmed " It is not necessary to name anybody" and then go on about avoidable name-calling while failing to avoid it yourself.
Sam
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:22 Reinhard Müller, reinhard@fsfe.org wrote:
Am 2018-08-29 um 11:05 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
If you don't have time to meet people personally, it is inevitable there will be some misunderstandings in electronic communications, especially for those trying to squeeze too many things into their life.
... says the person who didn't attend any of the two General Assemblies he was invited to, because, well, he had no time.
Yes, I do fully agree that a lot of misunderstandings, name-calling, mud-throwing and wasted time could have been avoided if only you had tried to talk to people (in person or by email) before making complaints or accusations in the public.
Best,
Reinhard Müller * Financial Team Free Software Foundation Europe
Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct