* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote, On 27/10/06 15:19:
All potential users of Savannah should consider the implications carefully if they feel they might be unable to meet this requirement.
Please stop spreading FUD. The implications are free documentation and free software. If those "implications" are so bad then you are in the wrong movement.
Some projects have GPL'd documentation provided by absent contributors. Some projects have GPL'd documentation provided by present contributors for idealogical reasons. The contributors possibly do not consider themselves to be part of any movement.
The implications are both legal and moral that such projects cannot be hosted on Savannah with the documentation.
You have said so yourself.
You keep using the word FUD. I do not think it means what you think it means.
It means spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt, so that readers/hearers take a decision based on confusion and avoidance of confusing issues and their implications, instead of making decisions based on clear informed fact.
The comments you have disputed have been clear and you have twice restated in agreement the fact of the comments.
There is no FUD.
Where you say "Savannah projects must use GFDL (compatable) license" I say "...and so if you can't use GFDL license don't use Savannah".
How is this direct and accurate clarification FUD in any way?
Sam