Bringing it back on topic, the definition of Debian and the surrounding project (regardless what the project members do from time to time) was raised to discuss how those definitions might be useful for defining the GNU Business Network.
What do you think of the suggestion made to draw lines similar to those drawn by the Debian project: "free", "free but currently depends on non-free", "non-free".
A bad idea, since just like Debian, you end up recommending and condoning non-free software by recommending businesses that perform unethical practises. This goes against the very core of what GNU is about: non-free software is evil.