* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote, On 27/10/06 13:42:
Which are perfectly fine. Please refrain from spreading FUD. The requirement for FDL wrt documentation is no different than the requirement for the GPL or a GPL compatible license when it comes to software.
PLEASE let's not start this discussion again. It's been done to death.
If it was, the MJ would be spreading FUD. Since he does, it is still alive and kicking.
I just have one point to ask AMS, as he seems to know: Are Savannah hosted projects required to have project documentation the FDL license?
MJ Ray said yes; I can't tell if AMS is 1. disagreeing with this as a fact, or 2. disagreeing whether or not this should be a problem; 3. or disagreeing with whether or not anyone should be able to point it out as something for consideration.
(2) has been done to death, I don't intend to debate (3), I would just like to clarify (1).
Sam