Hello,
Am Donnerstag 28 März 2019 09:47:34 schrieb Christian Imhorst:
in our last press release on the EU Copyright Directive
meanwhile we have updated the press release, because some passages were not clear enough:
https://fsfe.org/news/2019/news-20190326-01.en.html
Press releases often have to be done under time pressure. As we all know this increased the chance of making mistakes and get oneselves missunderstood.
"The exclusion of Free Software code hosting and sharing providers from this directive
Is a sign that the people who were shaping the current EU directive understood our arguments that Free Software development is important for Europe. They even understood that "non-commercial" is not enough to exclude platforms that help to collaborately develop and share code under Free Software licenses. This means that on this limited subject the FSFE is taken seriously as someone to talk to.
However we were not heard about the more general aspects about the directive, especially not about the dangers of articles 11, 12 and 13 (old numbering). :/
Other open source platforms, such as Mastodon instances, have to install upload filters
The directive always was about what is "shared" on the platforms, not how it is implemented. From what I've read it is unclear how this will be handled in legal practice. There maybe clear ways to construct something useful for peer-to-peer social networks, in any case it is getting harder not easier to compete with the major "sharing" platforms from the US, so it is a clear advantage to them.
I urge the FSFE to argue *against* uploadfilters
We always did, though if the legislation keeps standing as it is, - there is a tiny chance that it will be abolished in the Council of the EU - I consider it valid to think how the bad effects of bad upload filters can be reduced by less dangerous updates "filters". This debate may actually proof that it is not possible, however.
Regards, Bernhard