On Tuesday 08 Dec 2009 11:00:08 designers-request@fsfeurope.org wrote:
a few small improvements
Glad you like it!
I've implemented your corrections (except for periods), along with a CC NC-SA license (see attached).
If you think its ready, will you email Peter about it?
Sam.
Hi Sam,
* Sam Tuke mail@samtuke.com [2009-12-08 13:51:42 +0000]:
I've implemented your corrections (except for periods), along with a CC NC-SA license (see attached).
We should not use NC. I think a normal CC-By-Sa or even only CC-By is absolutely fine.
Best wishes, Matthias
Hi Sam,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:58:39PM +0100, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
I've implemented your corrections (except for periods), along with a CC NC-SA license (see attached).
thanks! I'll review it as soon as I can.
We should not use NC. I think a normal CC-By-Sa or even only CC-By is absolutely fine.
Yep. We definitely should allow commercial use, in line with Free Software licenses. And given that we like reciprocal licenses, CC-BY-SA is my strong preference.
I'd even prefer using a GNU license for an official FSFE publication, but they tend to be too heavy on the documentation requirements for this sort of thing.
Best regards, Karsten
Again - "worlds" is the proper word! "world's" would equal "world is" - which is not appropriate in this context.
-David
Sam Tuke wrote:
On Tuesday 08 Dec 2009 11:00:08 designers-request@fsfeurope.org wrote:
a few small improvements
Glad you like it!
I've implemented your corrections (except for periods), along with a CC NC-SA license (see attached).
If you think its ready, will you email Peter about it?
Sam.
Designers mailing list Designers@fsfeurope.org https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/designers
