Bob, I've just realised we have lost some sections from the original. See an earlier version attached v 2.05. This had a section 14 Appeals, and section 15 Code of Conduct. I will try to speak to Shane but can you try and check back to see when these disappeared!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Taylor" graham@openforumeurope.org To: "bob blatchford" bob@openforumeurope.org; board@certifiedopen.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:51 PM Subject: Re: comments on Op principles
Comments inserted below Tks G ----- Original Message ----- From: "bob blatchford" bob@openforumeurope.org To: board@certifiedopen.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:19 PM Subject: comments on Op principles
All
Rod and I have reviewed the CO principle of Ops document and found quite a few inconsistencies and errors.
We have made some suggested changes and would welcome your comments - see attachment
Some other points to consider:
- In section 2.2 there is reference to 'Member' not 'the Member'. Either
this is bad grammar or we need a definition in 1.0
Gt - Agree need a definition - suggest " Member describes an organisation who holds a current Certified Open accreditation.
- Section 2.4 - Appeals - needs cross reference?
Gt Agree, will speak to shane - we don't seem to have he whole Governance part covered .Its on the website but not in the Principles??
- Section 4.3 - 'Effective Date' - should this be included in 1.0
Definitions?
Gt Yes, how do you want to set this? Your call since it relates to how payment/invoices raised.
- Logo - Will be supplying a logo to for documentation and web display?
GT yes - where does this fit in?
- 1st Section - Programme Structure - 9th para background - assume that
this is still required
Gt Yes
Regards - Bob/Rod
Certified Open Board mailing list board@certifiedopen.com https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/co-board
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.23/1114 - Release Date: 06/11/2007 20:05
Graham Taylor wrote:
Bob, I've just realised we have lost some sections from the original. See an earlier version attached v 2.05. This had a section 14 Appeals, and section 15 Code of Conduct. I will try to speak to Shane but can you try and check back to see when these disappeared!!
Might be some confusion here. Section 14.0 through to 14.10 appears to detail the appeal process in the latest version of the document I had on my machine (2.16), and 16.0 through to 16.5 covered the code of conduct.
Just for reference I've also attached the older 2.05c version of the document.
Regards
Shane
My confusion, happy with Shane's changes - these seem to solve the issue. G ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Taylor" graham@openforumeurope.org To: "Graham Taylor" graham@openforumeurope.org; "bob blatchford" bob@openforumeurope.org; board@certifiedopen.com Cc: "Rod Norman" rod@openforumeurope.org Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:55 PM Subject: Re: comments on Op principles
Bob, I've just realised we have lost some sections from the original. See an earlier version attached v 2.05. This had a section 14 Appeals, and section 15 Code of Conduct. I will try to speak to Shane but can you try and check back to see when these disappeared!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Taylor" graham@openforumeurope.org To: "bob blatchford" bob@openforumeurope.org; board@certifiedopen.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:51 PM Subject: Re: comments on Op principles
Comments inserted below Tks G ----- Original Message ----- From: "bob blatchford" bob@openforumeurope.org To: board@certifiedopen.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:19 PM Subject: comments on Op principles
All
Rod and I have reviewed the CO principle of Ops document and found quite a few inconsistencies and errors.
We have made some suggested changes and would welcome your comments - see attachment
Some other points to consider:
- In section 2.2 there is reference to 'Member' not 'the Member'. Either
this is bad grammar or we need a definition in 1.0
Gt - Agree need a definition - suggest " Member describes an organisation who holds a current Certified Open accreditation.
- Section 2.4 - Appeals - needs cross reference?
Gt Agree, will speak to shane - we don't seem to have he whole Governance part covered .Its on the website but not in the Principles??
- Section 4.3 - 'Effective Date' - should this be included in 1.0
Definitions?
Gt Yes, how do you want to set this? Your call since it relates to how payment/invoices raised.
- Logo - Will be supplying a logo to for documentation and web display?
GT yes - where does this fit in?
- 1st Section - Programme Structure - 9th para background - assume that
this is still required
Gt Yes
Regards - Bob/Rod
Certified Open Board mailing list board@certifiedopen.com https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/co-board
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.23/1114 - Release Date: 06/11/2007 20:05
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.23/1114 - Release Date: 06/11/2007 20:05