Hi Rod, can you confirm that all of the issues below are now resolved?
==========
Hi Stephen
Stephen Aitken OFE wrote:
For my education and fun I just invented a product called Nanowidget for CO and it got a bronze. I disabled hardware questions which then greyed out – nice feature. When I returned to revise my scores hardware was no longer greyed out but the disable button had disappeared. Is this OK?
This sounds like a bug. Rod, can you confirm this behaviour?
I found it very quick and easy to use for my product which is unique in the market, only has me supporting it, is not OSS but uses ODF. It only told me I had a bronze, not the actual score – is this deliberate?
I believe it should show the certification level and the actual score.
The delete button is very close to the modify button so it would be easy to delete by mistake or does it ask “ do you really want to delete”
A delete confirmation would be a good idea.
Re standards is ODF (and OOXML) only relevant to office worker documents? Does it cover things like article numbering, vectors for engineers, rendering, relational DB etc? Should we generate a list of things it doesn’t cover and then make moves to extend it so its better than OOXML in its scope? Areas which wouldn’t interest Microsoft. Or am I being stupid?
I think that the entire scope of extending ODF etc is beyond the remit of Certified Open. OASIS maintains ODF and it's their job to deal with that. In our case, I believe we are just using ODF as a good example of an Open Standard.
Shane